Islam is Self-Impaling

A Very Brief Presuppositional Introduction at Refuting Islam 

 by Mike Robinson

Islam is perfect, there is nothing to be added or changed (Abu Bakar Bashir).

Nothing is like Him (Sura 42:11).*

Some say that Muslims seek to use the sword against all non-Muslims. Many Muslim terrorists have cut off the heads of non-Muslims via a sword. It’s ghastly and troubling to know that many members of a a large religion seek to behead non-members. But Islam has another problem. It impales itself with its incoherent doctrine of Allah. In contrast, the true God is one in nature but has many attributes and exists in three persons (the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit*); whereas the god of Islam is one only, the van til islammany different names or attributes that are assigned to him are merely nominal, that is, they are descriptions of his will, and not at all characteristics that are essential to his ontology or being. Allah “is utterly incomparable.”*

 ”Allah Ta`ala is not a body with a form, or a limited, quantitative substance, not resembling bodies in quantifiability or divisibility, or in being a substance or qualified by substance, or in being an accident or qualified by accidents. He does not resemble anything that exists, nor does anything that exists resemble Him. There is nothing whatsoever like unto Him, nor is He like unto anything. He is not delimited by magnitude, contained by places, encompassed by directions, or bounded by heavens or earth” (Al-Ghazali:  Qawa’id, 1.3).

The deity proposed by Islam is a not a self-consistent concept. According to Islam, Allah is above and beyond all distinction. He is absolutely and completely one in every aspect of his being. There is nothing that can compare to Allah or is analogous to him. Consequently, he cannot be a person or a known entity. For, if he has personality or is a person, then he shares something in common with men. If you say that he is a non-personal entity or a thing, then he has many items in common with things. In short, Allah is not a person or a thing, as taught in Islam. Allah is ascribed as wholly and completely incomparable, transcending and beyond all things, as there is nothing that is analogous about him. Correspondently, he cannot be anything, and he is nothing. Something which cannot be a thing is nothing, and cannot exist by definition.

Muslim dogma adds to its theoretical problems in asserting that the Qur’an is the revelation of an eternal book located in Paradise. If Allah is the only eternal being, and nothing exists that is analogous to him, nothing can share anything in common with him in his being and attributes; hence, an eternal book in Paradise cannot exist inasmuch as this would make both Allah and the Qur’an eternal: The Qur’an then would be a distinct feature within Allah. Thus the Qur’an is not a revelation from God; it fails to be what it reveals it is. In essence, it is a self-invalidating and deceptive book. It drills a hole in its own boat of reason.

————————-

 *   Manhaj (منهج): refers to the manner by which truth is reached.

*   Masīḥ: The Messiah, Jesus Christ.

*  Perichoresis: A theological term concerning the doctrine of the Trinity that specifies the intimate union, mutual indwelling, and mutual interpenetration of the three members of the Trinity (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) in relation to one another within the one God.

*   Shirk (شرك): The affirmation of polytheism; idolatry. The sin of believing in any god except Allah and of associating other gods with Allah.

*  Tanzih: An Islamic term that means transcendence. The central meaning of tanzih is divine incomparability, which implies Allah’s transcendent distance from all things including men. Allah cannot be likened to anything: “Nothing is like Him” (Sura 42:11). Tanzih indicates distance, transcendence, reverence, and fear. ”Doctrine of divine exemption according to which God is unique and in no way like anything created” (Oxford Dictionary of Islam).

 *   Yahweh (YHWH): The Lord God of the Bible sometimes imprecisely called Jehovah and the English translation in the Old Testament is LORD (all caps). Christians profess that He is the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit as one God. He alone is the true and living God. He also calls Himself “I AM that I AM” (Exodus 3:14; Isaiah 43:10-11; John 8:24, 58). He is the only true and living God. Yahweh, in contrast to Allah, has real attributes and is tri-personal in His divine simplicity.

For a more comprehensive and innovative way to refute Islam see my Apologetics eBook Christian Presuppostions Refute Islam HERE

The Bible or the Qur’an part I by Mike Robinson

The Authentic Holy Book: The Bible or the Qur’an part I

 

By Mike Robinson

 

Introduction

A crucial reason one should esteem Christianity over Islam is that the Bible predates the Qur’an by many hundreds of years and there is not one passage in the Qur’an koran biblethat explicitly and plainly claims that the Bible is unreliable, changed or corrupted. There are numerous verses in the Qur’an that reckon the Bible as true and that it is the word of God. Islam’s holy book esteems the Bible as God’s word and the Bible was written before the Qur’an. Moreover, the two books disagree on God’s nature and the path of salvation. Clearly one should take the Bible over the Qur’an.

———————————————————————–

1. The Bible ascribes a different nature for God, and a completely dissimilar way and means to salvation than Islam.

2. The Qur’an affirms the Bible (Muhammad directed Christians to follow the Bible they had in the seventh century in Qur’an verses: 2:40-42, 89,126; 3:3,71, 93; 4:47; 5:47-51, 69-72; 6:91; 7:157; 29:45,46; 35:31).

3. The Bible is correct on the nature of God and salvation, not the Qur’an.

 

Many Muslims will deny premise two and will refer you to some Quranic or Haddith passages that suggest the corruption and undependability of the Bible. Yet, in light of the affirmative verses, that suggestion appears to lead to incongruity.

Precious Promises

As His divine power has given to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of Him who called us by glory and virtue, by which have been given to us exceedingly great and precious promises, that through these you may be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust (2 Peter 1:3-4).

Islam, along with every non-Christian religion, has one basic miscalculation in touching salvation: Its followers are trying to reach God, find God, and please God through their good works, sacraments, and rituals.

Christianity is God reaching down to man. Christianity claims that Christians have not found God, but that God found them. God decreed the directive for the Son of God to descend from Heaven to live and then die on the cross to pardon His people. Man-centered religion cringes at this thought. It insists that we try to be good enough to earn divine acceptance. It tries to put its followers on religious treadmills. Nonetheless, laboring to do those proper religious works and to clean up one’s soul is no real solution.

There are some who trouble you, and want to pervert the gospel of Christ. But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again, if anyone preaches any other gospel to you than what you have received, let him be accursed (Galatians 1:7-9).

Every false religion lacks the capacity to expiate one’s spiritual record of sin. Only Jesus can, that is why Jesus came to earth, to love and to die. Self-centered religion tries to conform and reform to earn salvation. Jesus Christ transforms through real forgiveness and empowerment by the Holy Spirit. False deities cannot provide complete forgiveness and eternal hope.

God is a Self-contained Being: Aseity

Some non-Christian systems (as the polytheistic religions and modern philosophical “personalisms”) posit personal gods of one kind or another, but those gods are not absolute in the sense of being self-contained. Other non-Christian systems accept absolute realties of various kinds, but those absolutes are not personal. Only in the biblical teaching are absoluteness and personality combined in the Supreme being.” [1]

First and foremost among the attributes, we, therefore, mention the independence or self-existence of God. … He is self-contained rationality.[2]

Allah leads astray whomsoever He wills (Sura 14:4).

Allah is the best of deceivers (Sura 3:54).

 

Yahweh is a “self-individuated Spirit.”[3] The Triune God is “self-contained fullness”[4] and “absolute personality.”[5] Christian theism assents to a deity who is self-contained and personal. Islam teaches that their deity changes his mind, deceives, and he can lie. Additionally, he lacks immutability, and thus is deficient of aseity. The biblical God has aseity. This means that God has self-existence, self-sufficiency, and He’s not dependent or contingent upon anyone or anything. The power of His being is within Himself. “God is self-sufficient or self-contained in his being.”[6]

Allah is not a personal being or a thing since he is “not like anything.” Thus he cannot be personal. Furthermore, he is inscrutably arbitrary in his decrees. In some ways the Islamic god seems fickle and capricious. This notion yields inconsistency and change; for Allah can do anything, including lie. He can deceive and mislead. He cannot ground changeless things for he is not bound to a nature. Changeless things, such as mathematics, logic, and moral law, exist and these require that which cannot change and cannot lie: the changeless biblical God.

 

The Sufficiency of the Triune God

 

The sovereign God is not someone who is beyond reach or beyond knowing.[7]

Van Til stressed the interlinking of God’s attributes in that the “immutability of God is involved in his aseity.” Since God is self-sufficient, He does not need to change like the Muslim deity. There must be a foundation, somewhere, that is unchanging and has aseity. Van Til illuminates this: “We must rather reason that unless God exists as ultimate, as self-subsistent, we could not know anything, we could not even reason that God does not exist, nor could we even ask a question about God.”[8] There must be a certain, absolute, self-sufficient, and unchanging basis for the intelligibility of our world: Yahweh. He must exist to account for the unchanging and transcendent laws of logic. Allah cannot supply the required pre-necessities for absolute and unchanging realities. Only the Lord God can. Even if Allah could account for the laws of logic, there is no basis for using such laws (since Allah is arbitrary and deceptive) to understand and interpret the world. Such laws simply would not apply. The true God alone has the ability and character to provide that which is necessary to make sense out of reality.

Van Til remarked that “God is absolute. He is autonomous.”[9] Man cannot be autonomous (not subject to the rule or authority of another) and the Muslim doctrine of Allah implies that Allah cannot be autonomous. For strict autonomy one must have true personality (Allah is not a person and lacks personality), aseity, self-rule, and supreme sovereignty which only the true God has.

God as Truth is Yahweh

That by two immutable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie. … This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast… (Hebrews 6:18-19).

For I am the LORD (Yahweh), I do not change (Malachi 3:6).

I know that that Yahweh, dissimilarity to Allah, provides all a priori essentials for the necessary epistemic elements utilized in all thoughts, knowledge, and achievements. The God of the Bible has genuine ontic attributes of omniscience, immutability, omnipotence as well as aseity (He has universal authority & reach) thus He has the ontological capacity (His nature) to be the ground for general principles, immutable laws, universal operational aspects of human thinking and understanding. In Christian theism God can be known (John 17:1-3; Romans 1). Moreover, a position that denies Yahweh as the epistemic (knowledge) foundation cannot be true, thus whatever evidence or proof one ascertains, must be discerned and processed with the rational equipment that arises from Christian theism and the worldview that is sourced by the Triune God.

The true God is the elemental requirement for knowledge, proof, evidence, and logic. He is the a priori truth condition for the intelligibility of reality. This is the case inasmuch as the immaterial, transcendent, and immutable Triune God supplies the necessary pre-environment for the use of immaterial, transcendent, universal, and immutable laws of logic utilized in all knowledge pursuits. Christian theism is the pre-essential truth condition for the grounding and understanding of knowledge. Christianity is true not only because it seems more probable than its antithesis, but because it supplies the basis for knowledge.

Muslims presuppose the rational necessities that the Christian worldview underwrites while they verbally deny it. What are the compulsory conditions that make thought possible? Yahweh supplies those truth conditions to establish the rational parquet for intelligibility. Van Til called this “method of implication into the truth of God a transcendental method. That is, we must seek to determine what presuppositions are necessary to any object of knowledge in order that it may be intelligible to us.”

Christian Theism and Salvation

As far as the east is from the west, so far has He removed our transgressions from us (Psalms 103:12).

Christianity supplies salvation certainty. The truth that Christ provides salvation freely and keeps those He saves is guaranteed. Through the cross, God removes the believer’s sins as far as the east is from the west. If one lived in San Diego and wanted to travel as far west as possible, where would he go? When he started out west he could land in Hawaii, but the Philippines are still west of that, from the Philippines he could go west to China, and from there France, and then further west to New York and back to San Diego. How far west must he travel to reach the east? It is immeasurable and infinite. And so are his transgressions removed as he trusts in Christ. His transgressions are infinitely eliminated by the infinite atonement through the cross. That is good news that the Muslim faith and all other religions cannot deliver.

Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29).

But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness (Romans 4:5).

Allah loves not transgressors (Sura 2:190).

All people require a spiritual cleansing. Only Jesus Christ and His death on the cross can wash away all their sins. Jesus died and rose again. No one else has done that for sinners. Van Til presses: “If God was to continue communication with His creature, it was either to be by condemnation or by atonement.” God through His mercy provided a perfect and effectual atonement through the death of Jesus Christ on the cross. Believe on Him and you will be saved.

Allah loves not those who do wrong (Sura 3:57).

He loves not creatures ungrateful or wicked (Sura 2:276).

But when the kindness and the love of God our Savior toward man appeared, not by works of righteousness, which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit, whom He poured out on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Savior, that having been justified by His grace we should become heirs, according to the hope of eternal life (Titus 3:4-7).

Access to God

The curtain in the temple was torn from top to bottom. We have the access to our Father that no one else can have. We come to God’s throne spotless, redeemed. … In Him, we have become the righteousness of God.[10]

The Qur’an says, “To those who believe and do deeds of righteousness hath Allah promised forgiveness and a great reward” (Sura 5:9). Ask the Muslim if he is doing enough good deeds to receive salvation on Judgment Day. Remind him that his repentance must be perfectly sincere for the Qur’an says, “O ye who believe! Turn unto Allah in sincere repentance!” (66:8). Only if the man, who is sincere, may receive forgiveness. Without faith in Christ, how can one know that one is sincere enough to be forgiven of God? The real solution is Jesus who paid for our sins on the cross, once for all. Thus Christians are safe and filled with hope in Him and do not have to fret about doing enough good works to be accepted (Romans 4:5). Christians do good works for the sake of love and gratitude.

Jesus vs. Muhammad in the Qur’an

Considering that Islam claims that Muhammad is the last and greatest prophet, it appears inconsistent that the Qur’an asserts the following concerning Jesus Christ in contrast to Muhammad:

 

  • Jesus was born of a virgin (Sura 19:16-35): not Muhammad.
  • Jesus is a Spirit from God (Sura 4:171): not Muhammad.
  • Jesus is the Word of God (Sura 4:171):  not Muhammad.
  • Jesus was sinless (Sura 19:19):  not Muhammad.
  • Jesus gave life to the dead (Sura 3:49 and 22:73):  not Muhammad.
  • Jesus is coming back again as a sign of the hour of judgment (Sura 43:61):  not Muhammad.
  • Jesus performed many miracles (Sura 3:49 and 100:110): not Muhammad (Sura 29:47-51).
  • Jesus is the Messiah (Sura 4:171): not Muhammad.

There is something exceptional about Jesus Christ; even the Qur’an avows such. No other prophet or false prophet has His divine nature and accomplished what He did and taught what He taught (John 1:1, 10:30, 5:18, 8:24, 8:58, 20:28; 1 Timothy 3:16; Col. 1:16-17, 2:9; Matt. 22:42-45; Mark 14:64). Buddha, Joseph Smith, Krishna, Sun Yung Moon, and Muhammad never did what Jesus Christ did. Jesus died for our sins and rose again on the third day. He performed many miracles. He claimed to be God and demonstrated His deity.

Growth through Love and Truth

Jesus promised that His Church would grow from a small mustard seed to a worldwide movement and it has: from eleven followers to billions of Christians in every country in the world. The movement of Jesus, Christianity, grew large and fast by the power of love, truth, peace, and self-sacrifice. Islam generally grew by the sword. Muhammad and his followers killed many Jews, Christians, and Pagans as they plundered their towns. Islam advanced by the use of force: Christianity through love and hope.

Jesus is the Messiah: the Christ. We can examine a pre-Christian and pre-Islamic source (not the New Testament or the Qur’an) to find the definition of the Messiah: the Old Testament. It, including the Torah, proclaims, asserts, and implies that the Messiah would be God (Psalms 110; Isaiah 7:14, 9:6, 43:10-11; Genesis 1:26, 3:22; Zechariah 10:12,12:10; Daniel 7:13-14; etc.). Jesus is the Messiah (John 4), so Jesus of Nazareth is the Messiah as well as God (also see Revelation 1:7-8; 22:7 and 13; Hebrews 1).

Jesus: The Truth

Prediction is hard, especially when it’s about the future (Yogi Berra).

The Qur’an instructs “Seek knowledge, in China, if necessary” (Sura 39:12). One should go where the evidence leads. There were 333 Prophecies about the coming Messiah written in the Old Testament before the birth of Christ. All these came true in the birth, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth. No other religious leader or prophet ever had massive predictive material written about their life before their birth. Jesus had countless fulfilled predictions about His life to attest to His claims as the Son of God. His virgin birth was predicted several hundred years before He was born. Islam attempts to use about a half-dozen Scriptures in an attempt to verify Muhammad’s claims. The Mormons attempt to misinterpret five or six Scriptures for the same reason in regard to Joseph Smith. Jesus did not have five or six; He had hundreds of clear and unambiguous prophecies that predicted events in His life before they occurred, even hundreds of years before His birth.

If a claimant comes and announces that He’s a god or the way to God, he should provide some evidence. Jesus Christ came and provided a posteriori proof by fulfilling numerous predictions. Powerful evidence would be for a man to claim that he is from God, and before he arrived, there were preexisting documents written before he was born, which contained hundreds of details that were forecast about his future life. Later, these specific facts were fulfilled in his life. If a cache of predictive material is easy to produce, why hasn’t anyone else started a religion, which provided hundreds of fulfilled predictions to demonstrate divine prescience? The reason is obvious; no one has the ability but the True God.

The prophet Micah foretold that the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem; Isaiah foretold the type of birth that He was to have (Isaiah 7:14); Psalms 22 predicted His death on the cross, as did Isaiah 53. The prophet Daniel, in chapter nine, predicted the day that Christ arrived in Jerusalem. Many more events, people, places, and times were prearranged by Yahweh and made known to men and documented before the events occurred. Christ’s coming: the place, date, type of events were predicted on copies of the Old Testament dated centuries before Christ arrived with extra-biblical sources verifying much of the details of His life and death. Noteworthy is the fact that Jesus could not prearrange the self-fulfilling of many of these prophecies unless He was the sovereign God.

Only Christ is Risen 

Frank Morrison, a lawyer, disdained Christianity so much that he set out to write a book disproving the resurrection of Christ. After months of research, digging, studying, reading, examining the evidence, he fell on his knees and trusted Jesus Christ as Lord. For the evidence, contrary to his stated goals, was overwhelming. He discovered that the proof for Christ was unassailable. He did write a book, titled Who Moved the Stone? and subtitled, The Book that Refused to be Written. Harvard law professor, Simon Greenleaf, wrote the text book on legal evidence, which was used for over a hundred years in American law schools. His tome taught the proper manner in which one ought to measure and discern evidence in court. Greenleaf was a skeptic and unremittingly blasted Christianity in his law classroom. One day, a student challenged him to investigate the evidence for the resurrection of Jesus. He searched the evidence, examined it, investigated it, and became a Christian. The evidence for the Messiah was overwhelming to the expert on evidence. The founders of the multitudes of religions, once deceased, remain deceased, including Muhammad. Unlike any other, Jesus Christ rose from the grave.

Islam’s main motif for denying the doctrine of the resurrection of Christ is to claim that Jesus never died. Since he did not die, He never rose from the grave. That notion goes against all the eyewitness testimony. Even Christ’s contemporary enemies did not dispute His death.

Crucifixion and a Resurrection

For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures (1 Corinthians 15:3-4).

But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness … “Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven, and whose sins are covered; Blessed is the man to whom the LORD shall not impute sin” (Romans 4)

The true and living God is just and righteous. Only through Christ’s death on the cross can mercy as well as justice be satisfied. An eternal Messiah paying the price for our sins against an eternal God is the only solution for sin and depravity.

A six-pointed star, a crescent moon, a lotus—symbol or other religious symbols suggest beauty and light. The symbol of Christianity is an instrument of death. It suggests hope.[11]

A simple framework to share with non-Christians is: Guilt, Grace, and Gratitude.

 

  • Guilt: All men sin and are guilty before God.
  • Grace: God extends His grace to men by sending His Son to die a vicarious death on the cross.
  • Gratitude: The one who trusts in Christ is forgiven of all of his guilt and sin and now serves God out of gratitude for saving him.

 

Faithful witnessing to Muslims involves the believer heralding the judgment of the law on the lost, and then offering the grace of the gospel to those without Christ. An almighty sovereign God, full of awe and righteousness, is not what the world wants. But He is the God all people need. The Bible reveals that “the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom” (Proverbs 9:10). Christians should press God’s truth on the Muslim with compassion and patience. We are not to dazzle them with rhetoric or blast them with an uncaring scolding. One must with compassion warn them. We should sincerely care for the state of their souls through the graceful preaching of truth and the gospel.

Conclusion

The critical reader should honor Christianity over Islam since the Bible predates the Qur’an by many centuries and there are numerous passages in the Qur’an that proclaim that the Bible is the word of God. The Qur’an names the Bible as God’s word and the Bible was revealed prior to the Qur’an. Moreover, the two books disagree on the nature of God and the way of salvation. Undoubtedly one should believe the Bible over the Qur’an.

see my Apologetics eBook that uses a unique approach to refute Islam Christian Philosophy Critiques Islam: Christian Theism and Presuppositions Refute The Muslim Concept of Allah HERE


 

      1. Frame, Cornelius Van Til, p. 58.

       2.  Van Til, An Introduction to Systematic Theology, (P & R, Phillipsburg: NJ, 1974), p. 206.

       3. Ibid.,Van Til, An Introduction to Systematic Theology, p. 233.

       4. Van Til, Defense of the Faith, p. 42.

       5. Ibid., p. 42.

       6. Van Til, Christian Apologetics, (P & R, Phillipsburg: NJ, 1976), p. 7.

       7. K. Scott Oliphint, The Battle Belongs to the Lord, (P & R, Phillipsburg: NJ, 2003), p. 161

       8. Van Til, An Introduction to Systematic Theology, p. 102.

       9.  Van Til, Christian Apologetics, p. 7.

       10. Keith Green, Make My Life a Prayer, (Harvest House, Eugene: OR, 2001), p. 141

       11. Frederick Buechner, Wishful Thinking, (Harper, San Francisco: CA, 1993), p. 21.

 

 

 

Spurgeon on Man Magnified Theology: It Relates to Mormonism

“If you meet with a system of theology which magnifies man, flee from it as far as you can.” Charles H. Spurgeon

Spurgeon’s quote helps identify the grave error of Mormonism: Its theology and its goal to raise men to the status of gods.

———————————————————-

Check out my Innovative Book:

CHRISTIAN PHILOSOPHY AND PRESUPPOSITIONS CRITIQUE MORMONISM:
How Christian Truth Refutes the Religion of Joseph Smith
 
By Michael Robinson
presuppositional apologetics Mormonism
 

Contents

Introduction

Chapter   1     Mormonism Must Be False: A Transcendental Critique
Chapter   2     The Only Inescapable Foundation: God In Trinity
Chapter   3     The Glory And Attributes Of The True God & Presuppositions
Chapter   4     Mormon Anti-Theism Presupposes Christian Theism
Chapter   5     Mormon Objections: A Conversation
Chapter   6     Justification By Faith Alone

Appendix: Varied Use of Presuppositions
Subsidiary Material: Reason, Theism and the Laws of Logic

Christian Philosophy & Presuppositions Critique Mormonism is not just another book in the standard collection of recent works refuting the Mormon faith. The great majority of books which disprove Mormonism use arguments that demonstrate the absurdity of the claims of the Book of Mormon & Joseph Smith. Instead, Robinson deploys unique “How-to” arguments which refute Mormonism at its core.

Robinson uses innovative and helpful arguments which refute Mormonism at its foundation. He demonstrates that the LDS god/gods fail to provide the necessary rational environment to be able to account for anything in the world. The author proves that Mormonism actually invalidates itself. Amazing!

The truth Mr. Robinson provides makes the argument against Mormonism rationally and morally inescapable and unshakable. The LDS doctrines (a god progressing, or the earth’s god once being a man) are carefully refuted and demonstrated as impossible. He not only exposes the horrendous errors of Mormonism as untenable, unlikely, and nonsensical, he undermines the whole LDS system using scriptural truths, the laws of logic, moral absolutes, and philosophy.

Christian Philosophy and Presuppositions Critique Mormonism discusses How To:

• Disprove Mormonism using the Laws of Logic and Moral Absolutes
• Demonstrate that the God of the Bible alone lives
• Rationally defeat the LDS doctrine that God is a physical being and was once a man
• Learn the certain argument for Christianity
• Discover that a false notion (such as the many gods of Mormonism) presupposes the true God
• and more (including some material influenced by Cornelius Van Til, Greg Bahnsen, Walter Martin, James Spencer, Ed Decker and James White).

Robinson’s fresh formulation is unique, impressive, and powerful. Mormons are not ready for this approach which rebuts LDS doctrine using the twin destroyer’s: the laws of logic and moral law.

This book discusses some difficult terms and ideas, but the author makes them easy to understand, simple to apply, and very appealing. Herein you learn how to use biblical truth to not only confound the unbelievers, but to bring them to the true Jesus Christ. No matter what counter-cult LDS book you buy, add this unique book to your arsenal for it will win hearts and minds in startling ways. The author demonstrates that Mormonism rationally falls by the hands of presuppositions, facts, and evidence as Mormonism cannot dodge the presuppositional truth.

E-book Christian Philosophy and Presuppositions Critique Mormonism Here

Paperback Christian Philosophy and Presuppositions Critique Mormonism Here

 

The Superiority of Christ’s Atonement: Fred Butler

The Superiority of Christ’s Atonement

Posted by Fred Butler at Hip and Thigh

…[O]ne of the best sources I came across for this subject [of Christ's Atonement] is Jerry Hullinger’s DTS dissertation entitled, A Proposed Solution to the Problem of Animal cross fireySacrifices in Ezekiel 40-48. As far as I know, his dissertation is unpublished and would have to be acquired through a library service, but it is worth the effort to obtain and read.  He has some published articles in the Journal of Dispensational Theologyone from 2007 addressing the Ezekiel/Hebrews problem of atonement.

I appreciated Dr. Hullinger’s study of Hebrews as it relates to Ezekiel and I find myself agreeing with his overall conclusions; but more about that later.

I wanted to draw readers to his study on Hebrews 9-10 which I found to be exceptionally well-done and encouraging. He showed how the Day of Atonement in Leviticus 16 relates to Hebrews 9-10 and the argument for how Christ is a greater sacrifice. He gave a really good comparison and contrast between what the high priest did on the day of atonement and what Christ accomplished with His atonement.

I thought I would share the comparison and contrast only slightly modified from the original table format to fit a blog article.

Leviticus 16 -The high priest entered the Holy of Holies alone.
Hebrews 9-10 – Christ entered the immediate presence of God as a pioneer for His people. He entered the “real” presence of God which guarantees present access for the believer into a better sanctuary. In addition, His blood secures eschatological access when the believer sees God the Father “face to face.”

Leviticus 16 – The high priest entered once a year.
Hebrews 9-10 - Christ remains in the presence of God. Because he remains in the presence of the Father, the believer has unlimited access now and in the future.

Leviticus 16 – The high priest sacrificed what was outside himself
Hebrews 9-10 – Christ sacrificed Himself which shows the superiority of His sacrifice and priesthood.

Leviticus 16 – The high priest offered for himself
Hebrews 9-10 – Christ was without sin and needed no sacrifice.

Leviticus 16 – The high priest offered many sacrifices for the sins of the people.
Hebrews 9-10 – Christ offered once sacrifice for the sin of the people and it was potent enough to do its work in one offering, and was therefore the only one that could remedy the “sin” problem. …..

see Butler’s full post HERE

Josephus: When History Is Written by the Loser

New Book about: The Captured Jewish soldier-historian Flavius Josephus who became a counselor Roman commanders

WSJ excerpts By BENJAMIN BALINT

arch Titus JosephusUntil recently, no ancient historian was more widely read than the first-century soldier-statesman Flavius Josephus, the greatest source of our knowledge of the Holy Land “between the Testaments.” In many a Victorian home and American Sunday-school library, a copy of William Whiston’s translation of Josephus’ works, first published in 1737 and reprinted more than 200 times since, held pride of place next to the Scriptures.

…To recalibrate Josephus’ legacy in modern times, the screenwriter and novelist Frederic Raphael, who was trained in classics at CambridgeUniversity, has written “A Jew Among Romans,” an eloquent appraisal of Josephus. In the book’s first part, he skillfully recounts the transformation of Joseph ben Mattathias, a descendant of priests, into Titus Flavius Josephus, confidant of emperors.
.
As a young man, Joseph acquainted himself with Jewish law and for three years lived as an ascetic in the Judean desert. In 66 A.D., at age 29, he was entrusted by the Jewish leaders in Jerusalem with the commission of governor-general of Galilee. In that role, he overcame numerous plots and calumnies as he tried in vain to persuade the Jewish rebels against Rome, bent on war and inflamed by volatile messianic fantasies, to lay down their arms. He endeavored, as he put it, “to repress these promoters of sedition” in order to save his country from political suicide. Captured by the Romans in the town of Jotapata, Josephus saved his skin by switching sides and predicting to Vespasian, the Roman commander, that he would soon become emperor. Like his biblical namesake, Josephus ventured an oracular prediction and when it came to pass was rescued by the ruler whose future he forecast.
.

Two years later, in the year 70, Josephus accompanied Titus—Vespasian’s son and his successor as Rome’s commander in Judaea—to the fateful siege of Jerusalem.  …Josephus had to hide his anguish as he witnessed thousands of Jews massacred, Jerusalem sacked, the Temple destroyed. His life, writes Mr. Raphael, was “broken in half  by the war of which he supplied the sole extant account.”

Returning to Rome with Titus and the loot from Jerusalem, Josephus was rewarded with Roman citizenship, the imperial family name (he was now Titus Flavius Josephus) and comfortable lodging in a former palace of Vespasian. …

He also spent those years setting down the four remarkable works that have come down to us: “The Jewish Antiquities,” in which he shows himself an adept exegete of the Bible; “The Jewish War,” in which, with the imprimatur of Titus, he chronicled the death throes of his country; … and “Against Apion,” a stirring polemic against anti-Jewish prejudices that joins a learned knowledge of Greek philosophy with a valiant defense of his people and his faith. Mr. Raphael describes him as “the first Jewish writer to advertise his people’s merits and religion to an alien audience.”…

read the full WSJ article HERE

———————————————

 Josephus in his Testimonium Flavianum offers a New Testament-era hostile source–an extra-Biblical record that matches the facts of Christ’s death and empty tomb recorded below:

“Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man; for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him; for he appeared to them alive again the third day; as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day” (Josephus 96 AD: Antiquities 18.3.3).

 

The work by Josephus is important evidence for Christianity, yet the real rational fight is between presuppositions. The Christian presupposes God who raised Christ from the dead and provides all the required preconditions for laws and universal operational aspects of intelligibility. Necessary laws that allow one to investigate anything, including the resurrection of Christ. Atheism is absent an accounting of such a priori truth conditions.
 
The brute evidence suggests that it makes more sense to believe first century Jewish eyewitnesses than twenty-first century occidental skeptics. Matthew wrote the following as a witness two decades after the resurrection of Jesus Christ:
 
But the angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you seek Jesus who was crucified. He is not here, for he has risen, as he said. Come, see the place where he lay. Then go quickly and tell his disciples that he has risen from the dead, and behold, he is going before you to Galilee; there you will see him. See, I have told you” (Matthew 28:5-7 [55 AD: Peter Thiede: Eyewitnesses to Jesus]).  
 
Nonetheless I rest upon Christian presuppositions since Christian theism alone provides the necessary universal operational features needed to analyse all facts including the details of history.
——————————–

For more see my Apologetics eBook The Existence of God: Many Infallible Truths Here

Hindu Priests, Hindu Prayers, and a Hindu Congresswoman in US House

Hindu Prayers, and a Hindu Congresswoman in US House of Representatives

hindu congresswoman

When a Hindu priest from Ohio offered the first Hindu prayer in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2000, the socially conservative Family Research Council denounced the prayer as “one more indication that our nation is drifting from its Judeo-Christian roots.” When a Hindu from Nevada offered the first Hindu prayer in the Senate in 2007, protesters from the anti-abortion group Operation Save America interrupted him, calling on Jesus to forgive the nation “for allowing a prayer of the wicked.”

But on Thursday, when Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, the first Hindu ever elected to the Congress, took her oath of office on the Hindu scripture the Bhagavad Gita, the nation simply shrugged. “I believe strongly in embracing diversity,” Gabbard told me in an e-mail interview, and for now at least this “aloha spirit” is spreading to the mainland.

Raised by a Hindu mother and a Catholic father in “a multiracial, multicultural, multifaith family,” Gabbard was exposed as a child to both the New Testament and the Bhagavad Gita. As a teenager, she embraced a Hindu identity and took the Gita as her guide. …

read full USA Today article Here

 

 

Christians may not like this–the answer is to witness and pray for Hindus. see my new Apologetics eBook Hinduism: Christian Philosophy and Presuppositional Apologetics Examine The Religion Of The Gods And Karma Here

 

 

Many Muslims are in great dread about the Devil & The Day of Judgment

I read an article recently and I was reminded how afraid Muslims are. Many Muslims are in great dread about the Devil, The Day of Judgment, sin, death, and more.

muslims fearThe gospel provides the means to relieve fear–even the deepest fears that may rest on truth such as The Day of Judgment, sin, and the Devil. Thus the Christian should remind the Muslim about these issues and proclaim the peace and relief that God gives in Jesus: His death and resurrection (Romans 4:5, 5:1).

My innovative eBook provides the biblical teaching required to effectively refute Islam and witness to fearful Muslims. HERE

Hotel Dumps Bible in Favor of the Sensual ‘Fifty Shades’ Novel

Yikes! Bible Out – carnal Fifty Shades In!

One more ungodly move by UKers attempting to delete all the Christian capital their culture lives on.

UK hates bibleThe Gideon Bible is commonly found in the drawers of hotel nightstands the world over. But one hotel would rather give guests a stimulating read that’s more sensual than spiritual, and visitors to the Damson Dene Hotel, near Bowness-on-Windermere in northwest England, won’t find the Bible in their rooms. That’s because hotel manager Wayne Bartholomew replaced the holy book with copies of the best-selling erotic novel Fifty Shades of Grey because “no one reads and many dislike the Bible.”  The decision, Bartholomew said, was influenced by the flood of chatter about the book from his Facebook friends. “I thought it would be a special treat for our guests to find it in their bedside cabinet, and that includes the men,” he said.

see full article Here

 

 

 

Christians must press the truth of the moral necessity of the Christian Worldview in a persuasive manner. See my eBook There Are Moral Absolutes: The Proof for Christian Theism: HERE

Elementary Schools Bring in Hinduism via Yoga

by William Carless NY Times

ENCINITAS, Calif. — By 9:30 a.m. at Paul Ecke Central Elementary School, tiny feet were shifting from downward dog pose to chair pose to warrior pose in surprisingly swift, accurate movements. …

YOGA hinduism promoted schoolsA small but vocal group of parents, spurred on by the head of a local conservative advocacy group, has likened these 30-minute yoga classes to religious indoctrination. They say the classes — part of a comprehensive program offered to all public school students in this affluent suburb north of San Diego — represent a violation of the First Amendment.

After the classes prompted discussion in local evangelical churches, parents said they were concerned that the exercises might nudge their children closer to ancient Hindu beliefs.

Mary Eady, the parent of a first grader, said the classes were rooted in the deeply religious practice of Ashtanga yoga, in which physical actions are inextricable from the spiritual beliefs underlying them….

The district has stood firm. Tim Baird, the schools superintendent, has defended the yoga classes as merely another element of a broader program designed to promote children’s physical and mental well-being. The notion that yoga teachers have designs on converting tender young minds to Hinduism is incorrect, he said.

“That’s why we have an opt-out clause,” Mr. Baird said. “If your faith is such that you believe that simply by doing the gorilla pose, you’re invoking the Hindu gods, then by all means your child can be doing something else.” …

“Yoga poses are representative of Hindu deities and Hindu stories about the actions and interactions of those deities with humans,” she said. “There’s content even in the movement, just as with baptism there’s content in the movement.”…

read the full NY Times article HERE

————————-

see my new Christian Apologetics eBook that reveals the problems of Hinduism as it gives you answers to refute Hindu thought HERE

20 Four/Five Year-old Children Gunned Down-Not by a Man Who “Snapped” but by an Extremely Wicked Evil-doer

Deeply Evil Man Murders Little Kids 

Expulsion from ParadiseThis murderer was not simply sick, or at rock-bottom–he was profoundly Evil and will receive the swift and just wrath of God.

Do not let the world and all its psycho-babble lead you to believe that the shooter had “reasons” or that he was merely sick: He was and is pure evil.

 

 

 

Psalm 1

6For Jehovah knows the way of the righteous; But the way of the wicked shall perish.

Psalm 7

Oh, let the wickedness of the wicked come to an end,
But establish the just;
For the righteous God tests the hearts and minds.
10 My defense is of God,
Who saves the upright in heart.

11 God is a just judge,
And God is angry with the wicked every day.
12 If he does not turn back,
He will sharpen His sword;