Reasons Why Countless Educated People Affirm Religion and Belief in Christ

Why Do Numerous Educated People Practice Faith?

 

I affirm Christian theism (CT) and practice the Christian religion by God’s amazing grace and because I studied the subject as I discovered substantial evidence for theism. I rationally found that God must exist and the contrary is not possible. Thus I aim to faithfully practice the covenant faith because God saved me and calls me to follow Him covenantally; this includes a structured religious form. Countless intelligent believers have conveyed similar thoughts to me. (also see my past post on Theisitc Genises HERE ).

Although the majority of the world, throughout the preponderance of history, has professed and embraced religion and theism, religion can often make some nonbelievers uncomfortable. Sartre claimed that he became an atheist because a man stared at him in public. He felt uncomfortable and dehumanized by becoming an object of the long stare of a stranger. He then reasoned: God is omnipresent, hence God must have His eyes perpetually on Sartre. But he did not like God gazing upon him. Many nonbelievers detest this fact; they are suppressing the truth in unrighteousness. Religion requires commitment and intelligent believers delight in this truth inasmuch as God lives.

These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life, and that you may continue to believe in the name of the Son of God (1 John 5:13).

I know that God certainly exists and He has brought me into the covenant and promises through the person and work of Jesus Christ; this is a result of revelation and God’s effectual grace that actualizes my regeneration. So I seek and enjoy my religious obligations. The name “Jesus” (Yeshua) means God is my Savior (or God saves/delivers) and thus Jesus Christ’s name is an ideal fit since Jesus is both God and Savior. We all sin, we all fail, all men fall short and we need a Savior who removes (expiates) our sins and replaces our sinful record with His perfect righteous record (imputation).

The claim that “Jesus is the only way to salvation” is not just a slogan, or a dogma tightly held due to intolerance, but it is true (Jesus is the truth), sufficient (He propitiated the wrath of an infinite God), effectual (all God calls in Christ are justified), and necessary (all men are sinners and require a Savior); moreover the exclusivity of Christ is clearly revealed in Scripture (John 14:6).

Job announced that he “knows my Redeemer lives” (Job 19:25). Paul declares, “I know in whom I have believed” (2 Timothy 1:12). It is impossible for the Christian Worldview (CWV) to be false. I am saved by grace alone, and I have truth and certainty. It is impossible for God not to exist. Calvin said that Scripture was so “clear and certain it cannot be overthrown either by men or angels.” Thus I and intellectual Christians delight in serving the Lord in our religious expression.

All men of sound Judgment will therefore hold, that a sense of Deity is indelibly engraved on the human heart. And that this belief is naturally engendered in all, and thoroughly fixed as it were in our very bones, is strikingly attested by the contumacy of the wicked, who, though they struggle furiously, are unable to extricate themselves from the fear of God (Calvin: Institutes 3:3).

Some people claim that knowledge is impossible. Nonetheless if knowledge is impossible, one could not know that knowledge is impossible because that is a knowledge claim. Christian theism is a worldview (WV) that provides human reason an unchanging foundation for knowledge. Atheism, naturalism, and skepticism all fail to furnish a foundation for the LNC (A~~A); thus they cannot provide a permanent footing for knowledge since knowledge presupposes and requires the LNC; the LNC is an immutable universal and thus requires an immutable universal foundation: theism. Non-theists can only offer a mutable non-universal ground for their WV. Theism is the truth condition for all knowledge because all human knowledge requires the use of unchanging universals. The omniscient, immaterial, and unchanging God alone provides the a priori essentials for the use of nonphysical, universal, and unchanging universals. Non-theistic thought cannot supply the necessary pre-environment for knowledge, thus it falls into futility. Considering that adherents to CT are captured by the truth, they are devoted to God as practiced in religion. The brilliant Anderson states: “At the very least, a person’s presuppositions will be implicit in the way he evaluates evidence and interprets his experience, in how he makes judgment about what is possible or plausible or valuable, and in how he actually lives daily life.” (James Anderson: Speaking the Truth). Lonergan concurs: “Our knowledge of God is both earlier and easier that any attempt to give it formal expression” (Lonergan: Intellectuals Speak Out About God).

Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ (Romans 5:1).

But one day, as I was passing in the field, and that too with some dashes on my conscience, fearing lest yet all was not right, suddenly this sentence fell upon my soul, Thy righteousness is in heaven; and methought withal, I saw, with the eyes of my soul, Jesus Christ at the right hand; there, I say, as my righteousness; … I also saw, moreover, that it was not my good frame of heart that made my righteousness better, nor yet my bad frame that made my righteousness worse; for my righteousness was Jesus Christ himself, the same yesterday, and today, and for ever (John Bunyan: Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners).

God the Father sent His Son, who is sinless and perfect in character, to live a perfect life in accordance with God’s Law and sacrifice Him for the sins of mankind. The sins of the repentant sinner are cast onto Christ: the perfect sacrifice. Furthermore, salvation includes the gift of the “righteousness of God” (Romans 3:21-22, 10:3; Philippians 3:9). This is the imputed righteousness of Jesus Christ (2 Corinthians 5:21; 1 Corinthians 1:30). His life of sinlessness and perfect obedience to God’s Law on this earth was required to give believers a perfect record in regard to the positive aspect of justification (Christ’s active obedience).

The Kindness of God

But when the kindness and the love of God our Savior toward man appeared, not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit, whom He poured out on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Savior, that having been justified by His grace we should become heirs according to the hope of eternal life (Titus 3:4-7).

The cross is the standard of victorious grace. It is the light-house whose cheering ray gleams across the dark waters of despair and cheers the dense midnight of our fallen race, saving from eternal shipwreck, and piloting into everlasting peace (Spurgeon).

All people are sinners in need of grace. This truth should send the unbeliever to Christ for pardon from sin’s penalty; a penalty that has been paid by Jesus on the cross. No one’s good works can pay the penalty for past sins, only Christ can; the believer’s good works cannot erase past transgressions. If I receive a speeding ticket, and I go to court and the judge asks, “What do you plead?” I say, “Guilty, but I promise I will never speed again. Judge, please forgive my ticket on account of my future obedience.” The judge would say, “It is good that you will not speed again. That is your lawful duty. But you still have to pay the fine for your past mistake of speeding.” The good news is Jesus Christ, as judge, came down, took off His robe and paid the fine Himself for all who trust in Him.

The atonement of Christ expiates the sins of the Christian and rinses his transgressions from his spiritual record. Then God graciously imputes Christ’s righteousness to the believer’s account. We enter heaven free from past sins, and clothed in the righteousness of Christ through faith alone and by grace alone.

The cross is the focus of all human history—I was almost going to say it is the centre of the life of God, if such a thing can be. All the ages meet in Calvary. Jesus is the central Sun of all events (Spurgeon).

 Finding Peace with God

The believer in Christ must say that without Christ there is no truth and goodness anywhere that will finally stand before God. Modern thought, like the prodigal son, is at the swine trough. The believer does not do his duty to men unless he calls them to repentance, and therewith back to the Father’s house (Van Til).

Romans 4:6 declares that God “imputes righteousness apart from works,” hence this righteousness of Christ is imputed to the believer’s account. God forensically (legally) credits (imputes) the believer with the righteous acts of Christ; the flawless works He performed as a perfect man on the earth. This is the great exchange: Christ gives His perfect righteousness in exchange for the believer’s sin. This is great news for sinners who by God’s grace turn in faith to God’s Son; as a consequence, Christ takes their sin and believers receive His perfect record of righteousness.

But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness (Romans 4:5).

Carnal hearts, until grace fully subdues them, are very loath to know their wretched condition. They love to not hear of anything that reveals to them the misery they are in (Watson).

God credits believers with the righteousness of Christ solely through faith by grace alone. Justification forensically renders the believer righteous and gives him peace with heaven. Without justification, the unbeliever has no peace with God. We must never assert that there is peace, when there is no peace between the ungodly and God. Without justification by grace alone, there can be no real peace (Romans 5:1). Imputation is the biblical term for the positive element of justification. One is forgiven and saved through God’s grace by faith: The believer is judicially constituted as righteous. He is declared righteous. We need to be justified by grace. Justification is a forensic term which speaks of the Christian’s legal position before God. The believer is declared righteous despite his unrighteous deeds.

For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly (Romans 5:6).

The Tragedy of Unbelief and the Hope of Faith in Christ

Pugnacious skeptic and libertine George Bernard Shaw wrote, near the end of his life: “The science to which I pinned my faith is bankrupt. Its counsels, which should have established the millennium, led, instead, directly to the suicide of Europe. I believed them once. In their name I helped to destroy the faith of millions of worshippers in the temples of a thousand creeds. And now they look at me and witness the great tragedy of an atheist who has lost his faith.” Yes it seems that nobody talks so persistently about God and religion as those who maintain that there is no God; nonetheless this yields despair. Since all Christians (including the intelligent believer) have complete and eternal forgiveness, they desire to serve God through religious practice.

see my new e-Books that contend for Christian truth:

http://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/MichaelRobinson

Some Fresh Applications of Presuppositional Apologetics

He that perverts truth shall soon be incapable of knowing the true from the false. If you persist in wearing glasses that distort, everything will be distorted to you (Charles H. Spurgeon).

Many nonbelievers and believers do not realize that they have personal biases, presuppositions, rational precommitments, and ethical assumptions that guide and often distort their view of reality. They are unaware that their worldview (WV) may misrepresent and warp all aspects of human experience. Many spend the majority of their adult life carefully safeguarding their thoughts, shielding their WV and ultimate precommitments from critical analysis. Many atheists base their philosophy on wishful thinking as they seek to put away theism’s moral directives. Since some atheists do not want to be restrained from their profligacy, they vociferously declare that God does not exist. That type of thinking is nonsense. The apostle Paul reveals:

The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.  Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools… They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen (Romans 1:18-25).

Jonathan Edwards offers this explanation: “There is no one thing whatsoever more plain and manifest, and more demonstrable, than the being of God. It is manifest in ourselves, in our bodies and souls, and in everything about us wherever we turn our eye, whether to heaven, or to the earth, the air, or the seas. And yet how prone is the heart of man to call this into question! So inclined is the heart of man to blindness and delusion, that it is prone to even atheism itself.” Spurgeon adds, “He who hates truth soon hates its advocate.” Their abhorrence of the Almighty is one reason that atheists deny God’s existence. (more exposition on presuppositions: article Here).

It’s a little peculiar that professional new atheists and e-atheists not only are devoid of an absolute epistemic ground (they cannot supply a changeless ground for unchanging universals such as the laws of logic: LNC and LOI), but they maintain a public presence and make a lot of dough promoting illogicality and error inasmuch as copious features of their anti-theistic goals are incongruous.

Of all the offspring of time, Error is the most ancient, and is so old and familiar an acquaintance, that Truth, when discovered, comes upon most of us like an intruder, and meets the intruder’s welcome (Charles Mackay).

A worldview based on Christian Theism (CT) furnishes the epistemic wellspring and absolute ethical ground for truth. The Christian Worldview (CWV) provides immutable universal absolutes (moral laws and laws of logic) necessary to account for reason, intellectual advancement, and knowledge as it offers an immovable epistemic base for “true truth.”

James Anderson argues that “if naturalism were true, there could be no knowledge” (James Anderson: Speaking the Truth in Love).

Knowledge is necessary for intelligibility and theism is required for knowledge. The truth of God’s existence is not merely feasible, it is impossible for Him not to exist. Non-Christian systems of thought cannot furnish an unchanging foundation for the law of non-contradiction (LNC: A~~A) which is necessarily involved in all knowledge activities, thus atheistic paradigms can only offer worldviews that fail to provide the continuous and immutable truth environment for the immutable laws of logic required for knowledge. Unless one epistemically depends on the true God, one cannot account for knowledge.

So, the Christian apologist may begin with any fact because, no matter what the facts he wishes to discuss, the stakes are ultimately the same. In every case, Christian Theism is in question. Do the facts belong to God or do they not? The challenge for the apologist is to treat the facts in a way that calls the God of Scripture—including the Christian system—into view (Van Til).

Van Til rightly taught that you do not have to learn to marshal volumes of evidence. One should learn to demonstrate that without having the true God as the ontological precommitment, ultimately the atheist cannot make sense out of anything. He cannot account for the universe, mankind, history, or science.

Likewise, Van Til stresses that whether “we are able to bring Christian Theism to a more full expression or only to a partial one, the goal is to express the biblical system through the facts. … Facts should serve as manifestations of the Christian system.” Additionally he maintains that the evidences “call all men to acknowledge the triune God, the final reference point for all meaning and truth.” And Van Til adds: “Men have not done justice by the facts, by the evidence of God’s presence before their eyes, unless they burst out into praise of Him who has made all things.”

The True and Living God

“You are My witnesses,” says the LORD, “And My servant whom I have chosen, that you may know and believe Me, and understand that I am He. Before Me there was no God formed, nor shall there be after Me. I, even I, am the LORD, and besides Me there is no Savior” (Isaiah 43:10-11).

The true God is the only God who lives and the only God who is necessary. It is comforting to know, not only is there incredible evidence for Christianity, but everything in existence is evidence for God. As God’s word teaches, every flower is evidence for God’s existence. It is not so much that we have to prove theism, but we are called to realize all proof presupposes the God of the Bible.

Atheism is impossible because it falls into absurdity inasmuch as it lacks an ontic base to depend on for its epistemic rights. It is self-stultifying. Non-theistic WVs lead to conclusions that are incongruous with their knowledge claims. A vital question is: What will supply the a priori truth conditions that make reality intelligible? The logical actuality is, without the CWV, nothing can make formal sense. The true and living God is the truth condition for the intelligibility of reality and the understanding of all human experiences; He must be presupposed for one to have adequate explanatory power required for knowledge.

 

And the Innovative Presuppositional Apologetic volume that utilizes new philosophical and apologetic research:

 Truth, Knowledge and the Reason for God: The Defense of the Rational Assurance of Christianity HERE

or see my New apologetic E-Book: The Sure Existence of God: Assured Proof for Christianity Here

or the Apologetic eBook God and Logic: Proof, Rationality and Theism here

 

 

Atheism Built upon Empiricism Cannot Supply the Foundation for Knowledge

Empiricism Fails to Deliver the Ground for Knowledge
by Mike Robinson


Many people say that they cannot believe anything unless they can see it for themselves; this is one usage of empiricism. Many atheists (atheism as their metaphysical position) hold to empiricism as their epistemic base (position on knowledge) for their worldview. They declare that unless something can be tested empirically, using the five senses, it is not true. The main problem with such an assertion is that this assertion cannot itself be tested by any of the senses. Thus it is a self-conflagrating assertion.

Another problem is that our senses are not one-hundred-percent accurate. They are mostly reliable, but cannot be completely trusted. St. Augustine pointed out that a straight oar appears bent when it is in the water. Many of us, as we drive our cars during a hot day, see mirages on the road. If an elephant is a quarter mile up the road and I put my thumb in front of my eyes, the beast seems to be no larger than my thumb.

The Hand is Quicker than the Eye

In Las Vegas there are dozens of magicians who make a good living by fooling the empirical senses of their audiences; the hand is quicker than the eye. Our eyes and our other senses can deceive us. We cannot base our world and life view on these senses unaided; nobody can.

Skeptics who claim that they only believe in what they see do not and cannot follow that philosophy consistently. Their use of logic, induction, and mathematics is not intelligible by the senses alone; these are immaterial entities that the materialist uses every day. To understand this world, God must be presupposed—whether the materialist realizes it or not. The notion that truth may be ascertained merely through the senses cannot even justify that two plus two will always be four in all places or that all animals will die; for the reason that no human can be simultaneously in all places where two plus two occur, nor can any human witness the death of all animals. The believer can trust the basic reliability of the senses only because an infallible God, who knows all things, has revealed that we can. The reason that scientists often repeat their tests and experiments hundreds of times is because the senses are occasionally unreliable. Men of science and industry have built instruments as well as machines to help bypass the inconsistency and unreliability of the senses. The five senses are not always reliable because human beings are not infallible and absent the divine ability to possess universal knowledge. Definite knowledge requires a man to depend on a God who is perfect, infallible, and omniscient.

Can One Really See an Object?

The five senses can provide awareness of and information about only some attributes of an object. This truth, conjoined with the practicality that numerous people claim that they only believe in what they can see, makes for an interesting discovery. Considering that in a way, under their non-Christian worldview, men cannot see any object. Human eyesight cannot give direct and immediate awareness and understanding of any object. Eyesight can provide information on some aspects and attributes of a given object. But only God can see all atoms, and only He can fully understand all protons and electrons. He has exact and exhaustive knowledge of the color, texture, size, weight, density, and complete physical makeup of all objects in the universe from a perfect perspective. No human can have exhaustive and perfect knowledge of even one of the attributes of a material article; hitherto some want to trust their eyesight and senses above the God who understands all things.

The senses are generally reliable; however we have justified knowledge because of God’s revelation. We must have a transcendent source that “sees” everything and reveals to us that the senses are basically reliable. The problem comes when people reject God’s word and construct a worldview based on their senses alone. Senses can routinely deceive. Professional illusionists get paid large salaries to fool our eyesight. Conversations between husbands and wives can quickly reveal how unreliable the sense of hearing can be. Many taste-test studies have demonstrated that the sense of taste is not always reliable. The Associated Press reported that surgical teams leave clamps, sponges, and other tools inside 1,500 patients nationwide each year (http://sci.rutgers.edu/forum/archive/index.php/t-1969.html). These are highly trained teams with large potential lawsuits looming over them, and yet their senses fail them at times. One cannot construct a reliable worldview based exclusively on the senses, as many scientists attempt to do. It is epistemically unmanageable for them to avoid the truth of God in view of the fact that all their theories, notes, and scientific conclusions utilize the laws of logic. Logic is immaterial, universal, and invariant; it presupposes God.

Empiricism Flops

Empiricism fails as a worldview every time you stub your toe or trip over a rock since this helps demonstrate the sometimes unreliability of our sight; our senses are normally reliable, but we cannot build a worldview on their untrustworthiness. God alone is the necessary truth condition for an intelligible worldview which includes the basic trustworthiness of our five senses.

Atheists can be rational because they borrow rational essentials from the Christian Worldview (CWV); the atheistic WV fails to account for the laws of logic that the CWV underwrites all the while borrowing them out of necessity.

Analysis of anti-theistic materialism demonstrates that it is self-nullifying inasmuch as it fails to give what it does not possess. The material cosmos, as a particular thing, is devoid of a foundation for eternal invariant universals; one cannot hang one’s house on one’s paintings, but one hangs one’s paintings on one’s house. God is the immovable truth required to hang knowledge claims, including atheistic claims.

The Rational Pre-essentials for Knowledge

I will employ a transcendental analysis by determining what the rational pre-essentials are for knowledge and understanding human experience; what must be true to be able to account for intelligibility. The triune God is the transcendental necessity who provides the preconditions for knowledge of reality. Mere men, devoid of immutability and universal rational attainment, cannot supply the transcendental conditions that are needed for the Law of Non-contradiction (LNC), love, and knowledge.

To rightly understand reality one must have universals to generalize the particulars. This implies that the sheer anthropology of atheism cannot supply the general and universal realities that must be present for the necessary and unavoidable transcendental conditions listed beforehand.

Some people claim that knowledge is impossible. Nonetheless if knowledge is impossible, one could not know that knowledge is impossible because that is a knowledge claim. The intelligibility of human experience requires God. Christianity is a WV that provides human reason an unchanging foundation for knowledge. Atheism, naturalism, and skepticism all fail to furnish a foundation for the LNC; thus they cannot provide the permanent footing for knowledge. They can only offer an irrational and incongruous WV.

Unless one believes in God, one cannot account for anything in the universe. God is the underlying and infinite ground for all knowledge, proof, evidence, and logic. It is impossible for God not to exist. He is the truth condition for all knowledge because all human knowledge requires the use of unchanging universals. The omniscient, immaterial, and unchanging God alone provides the a priori essentials for the use of nonphysical, universal, and unchanging universals. Non-believing thought cannot supply the necessary pre-environment for knowledge, thus they fall into futility.

“Of all the offspring of time, Error is the most ancient, and is so old and familiar an acquaintance, that Truth, when discovered, comes upon most of us like an intruder, and meets the intruder’s welcome” (Charles Mackay).

The Christian worldview is true because of the impossibility of the contrary. The contrary of the CWV implies a contradiction inasmuch as the denial of the CWV leaves one without the ontic (ontic: relating to ontology; relating to existence, being) foundation to ground immutable universals such as the laws of thought and moral laws, which are required for knowledge. The denial of knowledge (or its ground) is a self-contradicting endeavor.
For More see my Innovative book that refutes Atheism: Truth, Knowledge, and the Reason for God

Paul’s Two-Age Construction and Apologetics by Bill Dennison: A Book Review

My favorite sections at the local Christian bookstore and Amazon are apologetics and philosophy. What about your own preferences? Imagine if one day you clicked on Amazon, only to discover that your favorite books had been removed. Hundreds of years ago, something just like that happened when countless books at the Library of Alexandria were destroyed by fire. As part of a military strategy Julius Caesar in 47 B.C. set his boats on fire to prevent the enemy from confiscating them. The fire went out of control and spread to the Library. It burned almost a half-million books and scrolls. Such a calamity demonstrates how precious many books are. And William D. Dennison’s “Paul’s Two-Age Construction and Apologetics” is a valuable edition for anyone’s library. This apologetic “work was originally written in 1980 as a thesis” rewritten “in its present form for publication” (p. v).
This volume was dedicated to Cornelius Van Til and takes his thought seriously. Professor Dennison reveals that it “is an imperative … that the Reformed community reflect fruitfully upon the Vos-Ridderbos-Gaffin interpretation of St. Paul, for a restatement of Reformed theological formulation” (p. xi). His aim is to “deal in this work with the theological discipline of apologetics in terms of Paul’s eschatological two-age construction” (p. xi). He begins by “addressing the issue of synthesis” (p. xi) as he demonstrates “on the basis of Paul’s two-age construction, that Christianity is antithetical to any synthesis with secular thought.” (p. xi).
Within this fascinating, reader-friendly volume one discovers:
- Paul’s Christocentric eschatology
- The Two-Age construction exists in Paul’s Christocentric eschatology
- Background to Two-Age in relation to Plato and Jewish Literature
- 1 Corinthians 1-3: Antithetical Wisdom
- Apologetic Significance of the Two-Ages
- He utilizes the thought of Van Til but leans heavily on Vos and Gaffin.
The author discusses Plato’s theory of ideas (eidos) as he refutes this theory at its root (ontological foundation). Even though his treatment is brief he covers many important nuances and extensions of Plato’s notion of ideas. The good professor notes that Plato’s “a prior epistemology is rooted and cannot be separated from his concept of ontology, that is, the universal, real, and unchangeable world of forms” (p. 6). The author discusses the reasons Plato’s epistemic notions have “caught the attention of Christian theologians” and the reason Plato’s epistemology is unacceptable and inconsistent (pp. 6-12).
Dr. Dennison employs the thought of Vos as he counters the views of Bultman (pp. 28-31) and then begins a fine exposition of the Greek term “Kosmos;” its meaning, significance, and use in the NT (pp. 36-39). Dennison’s exposition of 1 Corinthians alone is worth the price of this compelling little volume (pp. 55-87). This section is of vital importance for pastors and apologists.
Although this is not a direct how-to apologetic book, it has essential practical importance as it helps the budding apologist lay important floorboards upon his epistemic platform. He presses aspects of Van Til’ apologetic as he affirms that `”fundamental to everything orthodox is the presupposition of the antecedent self-existence of God and his infallible revelation of himself to man in the Bible. Systematic Theology seeks to offer an ordered presentation of what the Bible teaches about God’” (p. 89). He rejects features of Van Til’s thought (and Murray’s) using a few words to attempt to refute momentous concepts. To attempt to sweep away such crucial Van Tilian concepts should be within a medium that allows greater detail and larger exposition. He ultimately affirms Gaffin’s analysis and method over a strict Van Tilian.
This volume is a solid introduction to the Two-Age view and it is written in a simple, direct, and influential manner.
See my new Apologetic book that utilizes Van Til’s thought:
[[ASIN:1432765914 Truth, Knowledge and the Reason for God: The Defense of the Rational Assurance of Christianity]]
or an apologetic book on ethics:
[[ASIN:1598007661 There Are Moral Absolutes: How to Be Absolutely Sure That Christianity Alone Supplies]]
at: