God and His Law: The Preconditions for Shame & the Relief of the Gospel

God and His Law: Reveal Guilt and Shame

Justice–if we only knew what it was (Socrates).

The LORD is compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, abounding in love (Psalms 103:8).

 We all, at times, feel the emotional state of guilt and shame. This guilt and shame we feel when we break a moral law, at least tacitly, assume God and His fixed just law (Romans 1:18-27). In principle, an immutable moral obligation can only be justified by appealing to the immutable, sovereign, omnipotent, and good Lawgiver (an ontic foundation: what is). Man feels shame and guilt when he disobeys inasmuch as he has done this to a personal loving God. We know (epistemic: what we know) this through our conscience and God’s Word.  Accordingly, it appears obvious, prima facie, that anti-theism is not just to be rejected as a foundation for moral law, but it is unbearable. But one doesn’t have to rest on the unendurable; submit to the moral Lordship of God and conform to His Word. This is veracious since God is the self-existent, holy, and sovereign One who is the foundation of moral law and ethical principles.

Be perfect as your Heavenly Father is perfect (Jesus, Matthew 5:48)

Part of the magnificence of the Christian faith is the truth of God’s moral law, and its culminating expression and fulfillment in the Gospel. Jesus Christ died on the cross for His children and rose from the dead on the third day. Those, who trust in Jesus, have all their guilt and shame washed away. Yes, God’s law presses guilt on our soul, but God is a good and merciful God. Through the cross of Christ, He forgives our sins and gives us forensic (legal) and perfect righteousness in Jesus by grace alone. Christianity is the worldview that can account for guilt and shame, and is the only worldview that can forensically eliminate them. Christianity is the foundation for objective moral values and duties. And it provides the spiritual remedy for falling short of one’s duties through the vicarious atonement of Jesus Christ.

for more on Ontology and how to use it in Apologetics see my Ebook: Ontology: Studies in Christian Thought and Apologetic Applications HERE

Moral Absolutes Require God

Moral Absolutes are God Grounded and God Revealed

 

by Mike A Robinson

Before the mountains were brought forth You had formed the earth… from everlasting to everlasting, You are God (Psalms 90:2).  

Nazi genocide is wrong. All rape is wrong. Child abuse is wrong. These heinous actions are universally wrong. These are evil acts. Individuals and society are bound to right ethics by God. Righteous laws are good in and of themselves because they come from a good God. The God inspired moral code in scripture outlines the duties of mankind. It’s not just an axiomatic system, nor is it true and binding inasmuch as they are self-evident truths, first principles, or discerned by pure reason. They are absolute because they reflect the nature of God’s divine being. Our conduct is to be regulated by the law that comes to man by the authority derivative of a good and immutable God. A moral relativist cannot declare that anything is always right or wrong within his worldview and remain consistent. All non-theistic worldviews ultimately lead to the denial of unchanging ethical laws. Moral absolutes are true and must not be violated. God alone is the one who makes unchanging moral standards true. Moral absolutes (MA’s) not only point to God, but without God, no one can have any moral absolutes. The denial of MA’s self-defeating inasmuch as MA’s are presupposed within that denial, thus God must exist.

   People declare that all things are relative out of one side of their mouth, and then defend environmentalism as if it is always true out of the other side of their mouth. They know that relativism is not true! Obviously, relativism is a self-voiding notion, but they just do not want to be tough-minded and think through life’s important issues. Thus many throw around relativistic canards without ever thinking critically about the ground of their claims.

see my book on the necessity of universal moral norms:  There Are Moral Absolutes

http://www.amazon.com/There-Are-Moral-Absolutes-Presuppositional/dp/1598007661